This paper focuses on the movements of Discrimination and Fighting Culture, the journal of the “Conference on Discrimination and Fighting Culture” formed in 1975 with Hiroshi Noma as its chairperson, and KAKU, a literary quarterly (now a literary magazine) published mainly by Tetsu Hijikata, who played a major role in promoting cultural activities in the Buraku Liberation Movement.Within the theoretical framework of “publicness” and the “politics of interpretation of needs” proposed by the American political scientist Nancy Fraser, by examining the Buraku Liberation Movement within this framework, this study aimed to clarify the importance and potential of cultural activities related to the Buraku Liberation Movement that has been missing from the history of the Buraku Liberation Movement. The cultural activities of the Buraku Liberation Movement are not limited to those of the Buraku people.Cultural activities of the Buraku Liberation Movement reached their peak in the 1970s. At that time, cultural activities were hardly considered important by the mainstream of the movement, and were seen as a helpful tool for the movement. However, Noma, Hijikata, and other promoters of cultural activities tried to appeal the injustice of the Buraku issue and discrimination to the world with literature and culture. As if in response, many writers and activists agreed with them, and the literary magazine KAKU continues its activities even today. There was a need to reexamine the Buraku issue not only in the field of movement but also in the fields of literature and culture, and there was a movement to create this new need. In this study, the importance of Noma and Hijikata’s trajectory was revealed, which has been buried in history, and the possibility of reexamining the Buraku issue in a new way was clarified.