Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery 38 巻 7 号 1207-1213 頁 2012-07 発行
アクセス数 : 733
ダウンロード数 : 311

今月のアクセス数 : 0
今月のダウンロード数 : 0
ファイル情報(添付)
JCRS_38_1207.pdf 783 KB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( eng )
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy
作成者
Nakakura Shunsuke
Mori Etsuko
Nagatomi Nozomi
Tabuchi Hitoshi
収録物名
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
38
7
開始ページ 1207
終了ページ 1213
抄録
PURPOSE: To evaluate the congruity of anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements using
4 devices.
SETTING: Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji City, Japan.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: In 1 eye of 42 healthy participants, the ACD was measured by 3-dimensional corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CAS-OCT), partial coherence interferometry (PCI), Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The differences between the measurements were evaluated by 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis. Agreement between the measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. To evaluate the true ACD using PCI, the automatically calculated ACD minus the central corneal thickness measured by CAS-OCT was defined as PCI true. Two ACD measurements were also taken with CAS-OCT.
RESULTS: The mean ACD was 3.72 mm G 0.23 (SD) (PCI), 3.18 G 0.23 mm (PCI true), 3.24 G 0.25 mm (Scheimpflug), 3.03G 0.25 mm (UBM), 3.14 G 0.24 mm (CAS-OCT auto), and 3.12 G 0.24 mm (CAS-OCT manual). A significant difference was observed between PCI biometry, Scheimpflug imaging, and UBM measurements and the other methods. Post hoc analysis showed no significant differences between PCI true and CAS-OCT auto or between the CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT manual. Strong correlations were observed between all measurements; however, Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement only between PCI true and Scheimpflug imaging and between CAS-OCT auto and CAS OCT manual.
CONCLUSION: The ACD measurements obtained from PCI biometry, Scheimpflug imaging, CAS-OCT, and UBM were significantly different and not interchangeable except for PCI true and CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT manual.
Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
NDC分類
医学 [ 490 ]
言語
英語
資源タイプ 学術雑誌論文
出版者
Elsevier Inc.
発行日 2012-07
権利情報
Copyright (c) 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。
出版タイプ Author’s Original(十分な品質であるとして、著者から正式な査読に提出される版)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 0886-3350
[DOI] 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.036
[PMID] 22613688
[NCID] AA10688328