Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery Volume 38 Issue 7
Page 1207-1213
published_at 2012-07
アクセス数 : 733 件
ダウンロード数 : 311 件
今月のアクセス数 : 0 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 0 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00045956
File |
JCRS_38_1207.pdf
783 KB
種類 :
fulltext
|
Title ( eng ) |
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy
|
Creator |
Nakakura Shunsuke
Mori Etsuko
Nagatomi Nozomi
Tabuchi Hitoshi
|
Source Title |
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
|
Volume | 38 |
Issue | 7 |
Start Page | 1207 |
End Page | 1213 |
Abstract |
PURPOSE: To evaluate the congruity of anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements using
4 devices. SETTING: Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji City, Japan. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: In 1 eye of 42 healthy participants, the ACD was measured by 3-dimensional corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CAS-OCT), partial coherence interferometry (PCI), Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The differences between the measurements were evaluated by 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis. Agreement between the measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. To evaluate the true ACD using PCI, the automatically calculated ACD minus the central corneal thickness measured by CAS-OCT was defined as PCI true. Two ACD measurements were also taken with CAS-OCT. RESULTS: The mean ACD was 3.72 mm G 0.23 (SD) (PCI), 3.18 G 0.23 mm (PCI true), 3.24 G 0.25 mm (Scheimpflug), 3.03G 0.25 mm (UBM), 3.14 G 0.24 mm (CAS-OCT auto), and 3.12 G 0.24 mm (CAS-OCT manual). A significant difference was observed between PCI biometry, Scheimpflug imaging, and UBM measurements and the other methods. Post hoc analysis showed no significant differences between PCI true and CAS-OCT auto or between the CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT manual. Strong correlations were observed between all measurements; however, Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement only between PCI true and Scheimpflug imaging and between CAS-OCT auto and CAS OCT manual. CONCLUSION: The ACD measurements obtained from PCI biometry, Scheimpflug imaging, CAS-OCT, and UBM were significantly different and not interchangeable except for PCI true and CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT auto and CAS-OCT manual. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. |
NDC |
Medical sciences [ 490 ]
|
Language |
eng
|
Resource Type | journal article |
Publisher |
Elsevier Inc.
|
Date of Issued | 2012-07 |
Rights |
Copyright (c) 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS
This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。
|
Publish Type | Author’s Original |
Access Rights | open access |
Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 0886-3350
[DOI] 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.036
[PMID] 22613688
[NCID] AA10688328
|