校長養成・研修におけるショーンの反省的実践家論に関する一考察 : M. エロウのショーン批判を手がかりに
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第三部, 教育人間科学関連領域 55 号
133-142 頁
2007-03-28 発行
アクセス数 : 1249 件
ダウンロード数 : 2075 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 14 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/18555
ファイル情報(添付) |
AA11625039_55_133.pdf
749 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
校長養成・研修におけるショーンの反省的実践家論に関する一考察 : M. エロウのショーン批判を手がかりに
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
A Study on 'Reflective Practitioner' in education for headteachers : Focusing on M.Eraut's criticism of D.Schön
|
作成者 |
金川 舞貴子
|
収録物名 |
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第三部, 教育人間科学関連領域
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part. Ⅲ, Education and Human Science
|
号 | 55 |
開始ページ | 133 |
終了ページ | 142 |
抄録 |
The purpose of this paper is to give consideration to the professional expertise of headteachers as reflective practitioners by assessing the Michael Eraut's criticism of Donald Schön. The number of reflective teacher education programmes have been increasing in the last two decades and reflective headteacher education programmes have been gained attention in these years. However, there seems to be several ways of thinking of professional expertise of headteachers as reflective practitioners. M.Eraut is the one who is influenced by Argyris & Schön's idea, double-loop learning, and envisages professional education based on reflective practitioners. However, he criticizes Schön's idea, 'reflection' and provides his original point of view. The points of Eraut's criticisms and a suggestion are as follows: 1. Schön's idea of reflection is problematic. The difference between reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action is not clear. His interest is not so much reflection-in and on-action as 'reflection-for-action'. 2. Schön does not regard for the effect of time scale to the form of reflection. 3. The deliberate meta-process should be focused on the most in professional education. Next, I gave examination against these Eraut's criticisms. The points are as follows: 1. Reflection-in-action is core of artistry of professional practice in the uncertainty. 2. The difference between two types of reflection comes not from time scale but from 'present-action'. 3. The importance of 'Reflection on reflection-in-action'. Finally, based on the comparison of Eraut and Schön, the way of education for headteachers should be is suggested: the importance of designing "reflective practicum" in the curriculum, which is characterized by "learning by doing" and "coaching". It helps to bridge the academic world and the practice world.
|
著者キーワード |
校長養成・研修
反省的実践家
行為の中の省察
状況との対話
省察的実習
Education for aspiring and incumbent headteachers
reflective practitioners
reflection-in-action
dialog with material
reflective practicum
|
NDC分類 |
教育 [ 370 ]
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
|
発行日 | 2007-03-28 |
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 1346-5562
[NCID] AA11625039
|