校長養成・研修におけるショーンの反省的実践家論に関する一考察 : M. エロウのショーン批判を手がかりに

アクセス数 : 1249
ダウンロード数 : 2075

今月のアクセス数 : 4
今月のダウンロード数 : 14
File
AA11625039_55_133.pdf 749 KB 種類 : fulltext
Title ( jpn )
校長養成・研修におけるショーンの反省的実践家論に関する一考察 : M. エロウのショーン批判を手がかりに
Title ( eng )
A Study on 'Reflective Practitioner' in education for headteachers : Focusing on M.Eraut's criticism of D.Schön
Creator
Kanagawa Makiko
Source Title
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第三部, 教育人間科学関連領域
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part. Ⅲ, Education and Human Science
Issue 55
Start Page 133
End Page 142
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to give consideration to the professional expertise of headteachers as reflective practitioners by assessing the Michael Eraut's criticism of Donald Schön. The number of reflective teacher education programmes have been increasing in the last two decades and reflective headteacher education programmes have been gained attention in these years. However, there seems to be several ways of thinking of professional expertise of headteachers as reflective practitioners. M.Eraut is the one who is influenced by Argyris & Schön's idea, double-loop learning, and envisages professional education based on reflective practitioners. However, he criticizes Schön's idea, 'reflection' and provides his original point of view. The points of Eraut's criticisms and a suggestion are as follows: 1. Schön's idea of reflection is problematic. The difference between reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action is not clear. His interest is not so much reflection-in and on-action as 'reflection-for-action'. 2. Schön does not regard for the effect of time scale to the form of reflection. 3. The deliberate meta-process should be focused on the most in professional education. Next, I gave examination against these Eraut's criticisms. The points are as follows: 1. Reflection-in-action is core of artistry of professional practice in the uncertainty. 2. The difference between two types of reflection comes not from time scale but from 'present-action'. 3. The importance of 'Reflection on reflection-in-action'. Finally, based on the comparison of Eraut and Schön, the way of education for headteachers should be is suggested: the importance of designing "reflective practicum" in the curriculum, which is characterized by "learning by doing" and "coaching". It helps to bridge the academic world and the practice world.
Keywords
校長養成・研修
反省的実践家
行為の中の省察
状況との対話
省察的実習
Education for aspiring and incumbent headteachers
reflective practitioners
reflection-in-action
dialog with material
reflective practicum
NDC
Education [ 370 ]
Language
jpn
Resource Type departmental bulletin paper
Publisher
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
Date of Issued 2007-03-28
Publish Type Version of Record
Access Rights open access
Source Identifier
[ISSN] 1346-5562
[NCID] AA11625039