バーリン思想における「消極的自由」の教育学的意義 : 哲学的な議論との連続と展開

アクセス数 : 3
ダウンロード数 : 1

今月のアクセス数 : 3
今月のダウンロード数 : 1
File
Title ( jpn )
バーリン思想における「消極的自由」の教育学的意義 : 哲学的な議論との連続と展開
Title ( eng )
Educational Meaning of ‘Negative Liberty’ in Berlin’s Thought: Focusing on continuity and development with philosophical arguments
Creator
Takasu Akane
Source Title
広島大学大学院人間社会科学研究科紀要. 教育学研究
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University. Studies in education
Issue 5
Start Page 204
End Page 212
Number of Pages 9
Journal Identifire
[ISSN] 2436-0333
[NCID] AA12909086
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the two concepts of liberty in continuity with the philosophical arguments conceived early in Berlin's thought, and to further clarify the value of “negative liberty” and its implications for educational research. Berlin, along with his colleagues at Oxford University, was primarily critical of the logical positivists. He took issue with the fact that logical positivists base their arguments on the “correspondence model,” which attempts to make a one-to-one correspondence between certain propositions and the world and pointed out three fallacies underlying such thinking. Through these points, we were able to clarify that the grasp of the world based on the“ correspondence model” has a problem in principle and to confirm that it was the prototype for the criticism of monism, which later became the core of his thought. Then, in the Two Concepts of Liberty, he develops the criticism that positive liberty grasps the world in a monistic way. Asserting the importance of negative liberty on a pluralistic foundation, Berlin finds the value of negative liberty in understanding it as a condition for the exercise of freedom. However, it became clear that such conditions and freedom need to be distinguished, and that while recognizing the importance of developing conditions, we must not forget the value of negative liberty itself, which is“ the absence of obstacles to possible choices and activities. Among several suggestions, I argued that we should be cautious about translating problems into a more understandable form, no matter how difficult they may be to solve.
Keywords
Isaiah Berlin
negative liberty
pluralism
monism
correspondence model
アイザイア・バーリン
消極的自由
一元論
多元論
対応モデル
Language
jpn
Resource Type departmental bulletin paper
Publisher
広島大学大学院人間社会科学研究科
Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University
Date of Issued 2024-12-20
Rights
Copyright © 2024 人間社会科学研究科
Publish Type Version of Record
Access Rights open access