本人訴訟体験からの法律学修(3) : 連絡ミスで累積した賃料連帯保証債務の免除
広島大学大学院人間社会科学研究科紀要. 教育学研究 3 号
61-70 頁
2022-12-23 発行
アクセス数 : 168 件
ダウンロード数 : 180 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 3 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/53380
ファイル情報(添付) |
BullGradSchHumanitSocSciHUStuEdu_3_61.pdf
746 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
本人訴訟体験からの法律学修(3) : 連絡ミスで累積した賃料連帯保証債務の免除
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
Legal Learning through the Experience of Lawsuit in Person (3): The Socio-Legal Studies on a Case of Having Forgiven his Debt Owing of Rents Increased without Report to a Joint Guarantor
|
作成者 | |
収録物名 |
広島大学大学院人間社会科学研究科紀要. 教育学研究
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University. Studies in education
|
号 | 3 |
開始ページ | 61 |
終了ページ | 70 |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 2436-0333
[NCID] AA12909086
|
抄録 |
As a third report of the socio-legal studies through my series of litigations in person, a not filing case I dealt with several years ago is introduced. It had the complicated legal problems whether our condominium association charged some monthly parking rents of a tenant dying alone to the joint guarantor or not, and, if any, how much of the former’s negative heritage. Having received the notice of his excessive debt and non-dividend from the lawyer who the family court had appointed as a property custodian, our board of directors deliberately discussed on the cosigner’s responsibility in six months. Then I, as the chairperson, found and referred to the neighborhood case regarding to the ten years cumulative rents of a municipal house. In the case the district court held that the main role of such a comaker was to remind the primary obligator of payment rather than a last security or money tree, and dismissed the claim in a lump at all as an abuse of creditor’s right, because the municipal, as a debtee, had failed to demand him throughout last 13 years. Later the higher court also affirmed the abuse but approved only one year payment of ten years amount claimed to the joint surety, like subsequent similar cases. Although we had calculated costs and benefits of a lawsuit and considered respective contributions of all parties in details, only to decide disclamation, I, as a legal scholar, could find and study some precedents and recent corrections of civil law at great length. I showcase the process of our legal deliberation by lay persons as a typical case of no legal actions that would never be counted in official statistics and so be the treasurable legal lesson.
|
著者キーワード |
Judicial Cost
Lawsuit in Person
Condominium Association
Joint Guaranty
Debt Relief
裁判費用
本人訴訟
建物管理組合
連帯保証
債務免除
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学大学院人間社会科学研究科
|
発行日 | 2022-12-23 |
権利情報 |
Copyright (c) 2022 人間社会科学研究科
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 2436-0333
[NCID] AA12909086
|