Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
PLoS ONE 15 巻 9 号
e0238395- 頁
2020-09-23 発行
アクセス数 : 259 件
ダウンロード数 : 62 件
今月のアクセス数 : 8 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 2 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00051559
ファイル情報(添付) |
PLoSONE_15_e0238395.pdf
561 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
|
作成者 |
Nakao Yoshitaka
|
収録物名 |
PLoS ONE
|
巻 | 15 |
号 | 9 |
開始ページ | e0238395 |
抄録 |
Purpose
The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of various anatomical structures on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and noncontact tonometer (NCT), as well as to assess the interchangeability among the four types of IOP measurement: IOP-GAT, IOP-NCT, IOP-Corvis, and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP-Corvis), with a particular focus on bIOP-Corvis. Materials and methods We included 71 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and assessed their IOP measurements obtained with the GAT, NCT, and Corvis ST using a repeated measures ANOVA, a paired t-test with Bonferroni correction, stepwise multiple regression analyses and Bland–Altman plots. Results IOP-GAT showed the highest values (13.5 ± 2.1 mmHg [mean ± standard deviation]), followed by IOP-NCT (13.2 ± 2.7 mmHg), IOP-Corvis (10.6 ± 2.8 mmHg), and bIOP-Corvis (10.0 ± 2.3 mmHg). With exceptions of bIOP-Corvis and IOP-GAT, all IOP variations were explained by regression coefficients involving the central corneal thickness. Bland–Altman plots showed a mean difference between IOP-GAT and the other IOP measurements (IOPCorvis, bIOP-Corvis, and IOP-NCT), which were -2.90, -3.48, and -0.29 mmHg, respectively. The widths of the 95% limits of agreement between all pairs of IOP measurements were greater than 3 mmHg. Conclusion IOP values obtained with the Corvis ST, NCT, and GAT were not interchangeable. The bIOP-Corvis measurement corrected for the ocular structure. |
言語 |
英語
|
資源タイプ | 学術雑誌論文 |
出版者 |
Public Library of Science
|
発行日 | 2020-09-23 |
権利情報 |
© 2020 Nakao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 1932-6203
[DOI] 10.1371/journal.pone.0238395
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238395
|