Jinrin and Sittlichkeit: A comparison between two theories of community
ぷらくしす 20 巻
65-81 頁
2019-03-28 発行
アクセス数 : 745 件
ダウンロード数 : 135 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 3 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/47414
| ファイル情報(添付) | |
| タイトル ( eng ) |
Jinrin and Sittlichkeit: A comparison between two theories of community
|
| 作成者 | |
| 収録物名 |
ぷらくしす
Praxis
|
| 巻 | 20 |
| 開始ページ | 65 |
| 終了ページ | 81 |
| 収録物識別子 |
[PISSN] 1880-8638
[NCID] AA11486249
|
| 抄録 |
The Japanese representative philosopher Tetsurō Watsuji's ethical theory has been influenced by Hegel, as many interpreters of Watsuji's work have pointed out. It is sure that there are many resemblances between Watsuji's ethical theory and that of Hegel. However, the foundational concepts of Watsuji's ethical theory, namely, "aidagara (social relation)" and the dialectic of "kū (emptiness)," can be found in his work before his intensive study of Hegel. In this article, I aim to elucidate the key differences in terms of the foundational thoughts between Watsuji's theory of "aidagara" and Hegel's theory of "Sittlichkeit (ethical life)." I will argue that the inter-relation of subjects as "aidagara" for Watsuji is a "given" in the sense that it already and always exists, and that, in contrast to this, the inter-relation of subjects as "recognition" for Hegel needs to be achieved or restored.
|
| 著者キーワード |
aidagara
jinrin
recognition
spirit
Sittlichkeit
|
| 内容記述 |
広島大学応用倫理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書
統一テーマ : ［平和と和解］ 《Frieden und Versöhnung》
|
| 言語 |
英語
|
| 資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
| 出版者 |
広島大学応用倫理学プロジェクト研究センター, 西日本応用倫理学研究会
|
| 発行日 | 2019-03-28 |
| 出版タイプ | Version of Record（出版社版。早期公開を含む） |
| アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
| 収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 1880-8638
[NCID] AA11486249
|
