Jinrin and Sittlichkeit: A comparison between two theories of community
ぷらくしす Volume 20
Page 65-81
published_at 2019-03-28
アクセス数 : 745 件
ダウンロード数 : 135 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 3 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/47414
| File | |
| Title ( eng ) |
Jinrin and Sittlichkeit: A comparison between two theories of community
|
| Creator | |
| Source Title |
ぷらくしす
Praxis
|
| Volume | 20 |
| Start Page | 65 |
| End Page | 81 |
| Journal Identifire |
[PISSN] 1880-8638
[NCID] AA11486249
|
| Abstract |
The Japanese representative philosopher Tetsurō Watsuji's ethical theory has been influenced by Hegel, as many interpreters of Watsuji's work have pointed out. It is sure that there are many resemblances between Watsuji's ethical theory and that of Hegel. However, the foundational concepts of Watsuji's ethical theory, namely, "aidagara (social relation)" and the dialectic of "kū (emptiness)," can be found in his work before his intensive study of Hegel. In this article, I aim to elucidate the key differences in terms of the foundational thoughts between Watsuji's theory of "aidagara" and Hegel's theory of "Sittlichkeit (ethical life)." I will argue that the inter-relation of subjects as "aidagara" for Watsuji is a "given" in the sense that it already and always exists, and that, in contrast to this, the inter-relation of subjects as "recognition" for Hegel needs to be achieved or restored.
|
| Keywords |
aidagara
jinrin
recognition
spirit
Sittlichkeit
|
| Descriptions |
広島大学応用倫理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書
統一テーマ : ［平和と和解］ 《Frieden und Versöhnung》
|
| Language |
eng
|
| Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
| Publisher |
広島大学応用倫理学プロジェクト研究センター, 西日本応用倫理学研究会
|
| Date of Issued | 2019-03-28 |
| Publish Type | Version of Record |
| Access Rights | open access |
| Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 1880-8638
[NCID] AA11486249
|
