「ソクラテス式問答」と道徳教育 : カントの教育方法学

HABITUS Volume 23 Page 50-66 published_at 2019-03-20
アクセス数 : 1142
ダウンロード数 : 526

今月のアクセス数 : 9
今月のダウンロード数 : 3
File
HABITUS_23_50.pdf 990 KB 種類 : fulltext
Title ( jpn )
「ソクラテス式問答」と道徳教育 : カントの教育方法学
Title ( eng )
“Socratic catechism” and moral education: Kant’s methodology of education
Creator
Shimazaki Taichi
Source Title
HABITUS
Volume 23
Start Page 50
End Page 66
Journal Identifire
[PISSN] 2186-7909
[NCID] AA12942536
Abstract
Kant divides the methods of education into acromatic and erotematic methods. The latter refers to a method of education based on questions and answers, while the former refers to a method in which the teacher delivers lectures alone. The erotematic method can be further divided into the dialogic (Socratic) method, in which both teacher and students ask and answer each other, and the catechistic method, in which only the teacher asks questions. Although Kant prefers the catechism to the dialog method for moral education, he also argues that the education of children should be conducted in the Socratic manner. According to my interpretation, the background of this contradiction is the ambiguity of Kant’s view of Socrates, with Socrates as a representative of the dialogic method and as the midwife of students’ wisdom. Kant denies the Socratic method in the first sense because he believes students do not know how to ask, and agrees with Socrates in the second sense since the teacher let his students answer based on their own reason, as if he were a midwife. Kant also contrasts moral catechism (in which answers are drawn from the students’ reason) with religious catechism (in which the students answer based on their memory ), and argues that the former must precede the latter. Kant’s moral catechism consists of three parts. In the last part, the students are led to moral theology. In conclusion, Kant intended to arrange the catechism from mechanical to judicious, to establish a religion based on morality, not vice versa.
Language
jpn
Resource Type journal article
Publisher
西日本応用倫理学研究会
Date of Issued 2019-03-20
Publish Type Version of Record
Access Rights open access
Source Identifier
[ISSN] 2186-7909