Topology型統語観の紹介とその効用
ニダバ 14 号
1-14 頁
1985-03-31 発行
アクセス数 : 697 件
ダウンロード数 : 46 件
今月のアクセス数 : 5 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 2 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00047160
ファイル情報(添付) | |
タイトル ( jpn ) |
Topology型統語観の紹介とその効用
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
Introduction of the Topological View of Syntax, and Its Efficacy
|
作成者 |
田原 薫
|
収録物名 |
ニダバ
NIDABA
|
号 | 14 |
開始ページ | 1 |
終了ページ | 14 |
収録物識別子 |
[PISSN] 0289-0089
[NCID] AN0000428X
|
抄録 |
There can be a way of thinking in which constituents of a sentence would be assigned their proper position in the meaning space of the whole sentence figuratively given a cubic structure.
Such a tridimensional structure as shown in the figure is supposed as the interlingual basic structure common to Japanese and such lndo-European languages as English, German, French and Spanish etc. which belong to the Germanic and the Romance families. This is the model of the expression unit which we think fundamental and we call an athematic sentence or a "clause". The grammar of each individual language should take out the chains of words as variant maps of the solid structure underlying common to those languages. In the Global Clause Grammar, which is based on the topological view of syntax, we assume that such and such a position accommodates respectively such and such constituent(s) as follows: A : Auxiliary verb and copula (with tense) V : Verbal (infinitive and participle) S : "Surrectum" (roughly, so-called subject) Q : "Qualification" of surrectum O : "Oppositum" (roughly, direct object) C : Complement for oppositum (what describes oppositum appositionally) R : "Residual" (indispensable nominal constituent other than surrectum and oppositum) P : "Parathema" or "Peristema" (concomitant condition or circumstance: time, place, cause etc.) Applying the topological view of syntax to the following three problems selected for example, we try to explicate them elegantly: 1 . Identificational and existential sentence 2 . Active and passive voice, and ergativity 3 . Where and how to place dispensable constituents. Conclusion: 1 . There is a common base to both an identification al and an existential sentence. 2 . A common ergatival structure underlies active and passive voice. 3 . A sentence must have sufficient conditions for accommodating dispensable constituents. |
NDC分類 |
言語 [ 800 ]
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 学術雑誌論文 |
出版者 |
西日本言語学会
|
発行日 | 1985-03-31 |
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 0289-0089
[NCID] AN0000428X
|