私立大学等改革総合支援事業の政策評価 : タイプ１への申請・非申請に着目して
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第三部, 教育人間科学関連領域 Issue 67
Page 227-234
published_at 2018-12-21
アクセス数 : 1129 件
ダウンロード数 : 416 件
今月のアクセス数 : 6 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 3 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/46830
| File | |
| Title ( jpn ) |
私立大学等改革総合支援事業の政策評価 : タイプ１への申請・非申請に着目して
|
| Title ( eng ) |
Policy Evaluation of Private University Reform: Applying for Type 1 Status
|
| Creator |
Matsumiya Shinji
|
| Source Title |
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第三部, 教育人間科学関連領域
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part 3, Education and human science
|
| Issue | 67 |
| Start Page | 227 |
| End Page | 234 |
| Abstract |
This study investigated policy evaluations in private university reform by Panel Data Analysis, with a focus on universities that apply for type 1 status. In particular, the main study questions were: (1) what kind of universities has applied for type 1 status? (2) Has educational investment increased because of the application or because these universities have applied for type 1 status? (3) How are the four representative approaches (“IR” “Assessment” “Classes Evaluation” “Numbering”) specified in related to the first and second questions? The results show that large universities or those that do not require resources for educational investment are applying for type 1 status to obtain funds. “Numbering” that explain the systematic nature of curriculum was the only approach that positively influenced application for type 1 status. Applying for type 1 status was found to have a rather negative effect on educational investment. In addition, the increase in educational investment proved that the size of the university, its age of history, or individualized education were effective. In addition, among the four representative approaches that positively influenced educational investment, “Numbering” was the most representative. The primary results show the (1) Differentiation by function by subsidy guidance is not promoted, rather it may have a negative effects; 2) the necessary scientific basis in the government’s selection of institutional functions; and 3) these policy evaluations hobble small-scale universities, which find it difficult to apply for funding.
|
| Keywords |
Competitive Funds
Subsidization of Private Universities
Private University Reform
Panel Data Analysis
競争的資金
私学助成
私立大学等改革総合支援事業
パネル・データ分析
|
| Descriptions |
本研究推進に際し，以下の資金の支援を受けた。記して感謝の微意を示す。
・ JSPS科研費JP16H03780（基盤研究(C)）「大学の全学マネジメントと学長のリーダーシップについての国際比較研究」（研究代表者：大場淳） ・ JSPS科研費16H02067（ 基盤研究(A)「）大学へのファンディングの変化と大学経営管理改革に関する国際比較研究」（研究代表者：丸山文裕） ・ JSPS科研費JP16H03780（基盤研究(B)）「持続可能な大学組織の探索：組織の規模と範囲・組織間関係の現状・変容・存続の分析」（研究代表者：村澤昌崇） ・ 文部科学省機能強化経費「大学における教育研究の生産性向上に関する国際共同研究」 ・ 文部科学省特別教育研究経費（戦略的研究推進経費）「21世紀知識基盤社会における大学・大学院の改革の具体的方策に関する研究－2007 年骨太方針をふまえて－」 |
| NDC |
Education [ 370 ]
|
| Language |
jpn
|
| Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
| Publisher |
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
|
| Date of Issued | 2018-12-21 |
| Publish Type | Version of Record |
| Access Rights | open access |
| Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 1346-5562
[NCID] AA11625039
|
