The Efficacy of Education with the WHO Dengue Algorithm on Correct Diagnosing and Triaging of Dengue-Suspected Patients; Study in Public Health Centre

アクセス数 : 774
ダウンロード数 : 114

今月のアクセス数 : 0
今月のダウンロード数 : 0
ファイル情報(添付)
HiroshimaJMedSci_67s_35.pdf 318 KB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( eng )
The Efficacy of Education with the WHO Dengue Algorithm on Correct Diagnosing and Triaging of Dengue-Suspected Patients; Study in Public Health Centre
作成者
Pyt Pauwels Patrick
Fm Metsemakers Job
Himawan Ari Budi
Kristina Tri Nur
収録物名
Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences
67
開始ページ 35
終了ページ 40
収録物識別子
[PISSN] 0018-2052
[EISSN] 2433-7668
[NCID] AA00664312
抄録
Background: Correct diagnosing and triaging dengue fever remains clinical, but is difficult because of unspecific flu-like symptoms. Best tool at the moment is the easy–to-use 2009 WHO guidelines. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of educational intervention with the (adapted and translated) algorithm from the 2009 WHO dengue guideline to healthcare providers in the Indonesian primary health care setting of Central Java. Methods: Quasi-randomized intervention study implemented in two Public Health Centres (PHCs), one being intervention and the other control. Intervention consisted of educational actions on healthcare providers with a presentation, hand-outs and posters. All patients with fever seen in policlinic or emergency department were included. Data were collected with a participatory observation using the WHO algorithm as a guidance. Results: Pre-intervention, a total of 88 patients (n=38 intervention group; n=50 in the control group), and post-intervention, a total of 231 patients (n=105 in the intervention group; n=126 in the control group) were included. Pre-intervention, correct diagnosing and triaging was not significantly different (63.2% vs 64.0% ; p=0.935), while post-intervention, the intervention group scored higher (75.2% vs 62.7% ; p=0.041). However, in both pre- and post-interventional phase, more than 50% of the cases in 19/22 domains were not investigated by the intervention group. Conclusion: Statistical analyses showed a significantly better outcome in correct diagnosis in the intervention group. However, results are considered inconclusive due to incompleteness of relevant information, which most probably leads to many false positive correct diagnoses and triaging.
著者キーワード
DHF
WHO guidelines
primary care setting
NDC分類
医学 [ 490 ]
言語
英語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
Hiroshima University Medical Press
発行日 2018-05
権利情報
Copyright (c) 2018 Hiroshima University Medical Press
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 0018-2052
[NCID] AA00664312