動詞の意味構造におけるTOとTOWARD

アクセス数 : 979
ダウンロード数 : 346

今月のアクセス数 : 9
今月のダウンロード数 : 3
ファイル情報(添付)
StudLangCult_10_23.pdf 379 KB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( jpn )
動詞の意味構造におけるTOとTOWARD
タイトル ( eng )
TO and TOWARD in the Semantic Representation of the Verb
作成者
収録物名
広島大学総合科学部紀要. V, 言語文化研究
Bulletin of the Faculty of Integrated Arts and Science, Hiroshima University. V, Studies in Language and Culture
10
開始ページ 23
終了ページ 35
抄録
It has been suggested by some linguists with a 'localistic' viewpoint that the semantic difference as exemplified between (la) and (lb) is precisely that between spatial 'go to' and 'go toward' as in (2a) and (2b):

(1) a. Sue pressured Jim into singing.

b. Sue pressured Jim to sing.

(2) a. Sue went to New York.

b. Sue went toward New York.

The purpose of this paper is twofold. One is to try to substatiate the hypothesis by giving a considerable number of evidence in support of it. The other is to show the extent of implications it exhibits.

In Section 1 I present several semantic and syntactic phenomena which indicate that the contrast as to whether or not the reference event is achieved corresponds to that as to whether or not the goal is reached in space and thus lead us to assume that the two contrasts could be reduced to one in the semantic structure; and incorporate this assumption into the semantic patterns of the basic sentence constructions under a 'localistic' hypothesis of the verb proposed in Inoue (1975, 82). Within this framework the sentences in (1) and (2) have the following semantic representations:

(1)' a. CAUSE ( [SUE]. GO ([JIM], [TO (JIM SING)] ) )

b. CAUSE ([SUE]. GO ([JIM], [TOWARD (JIM SING)]))

(2)' a. GO ([SUE], [TO (NEW YORK)])

b. GO ([SUE], [TOWARD (NEW YORK)])

In Section 2 I make an attempt to explicate the implicational relations of two classes of what Karttunen (1971) termed 'implicative verbs.' By means of the inference rules derived from the above-mentioned semantic patterns, I demonstrate how we obtain from 'two-way implicative verbs' and 'one-way implicative verbs' their appropriate implications. This analysis is more explanatory than Karttunen's in that it clarifies the distinction between 'implicative verbs' and 'non-implicative verbs' in terms of semantic representation and, more importantly, in that it relates implicative behavior to a more general system of semantic representation.
NDC分類
英語 [ 830 ]
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
広島大学総合科学部
発行日 1985-02-28
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 0385-1494
[NCID] AN00077749