国立総合大学における内部資源配分の現状と考察
大学論集 Issue 55
Page 93-109
published_at 2023-03
アクセス数 : 234 件
ダウンロード数 : 152 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 5 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/53924
File |
DaigakuRonshu_55_93.pdf
950 KB
種類 :
fulltext
|
Title ( jpn ) |
国立総合大学における内部資源配分の現状と考察
|
Title ( eng ) |
Internal Resource Allocation Models in Japanese Comprehensive National Universities
|
Creator |
MIZUTA Kensuke
|
Source Title |
大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education
|
Issue | 55 |
Start Page | 93 |
End Page | 109 |
Number of Pages | 16 |
Journal Identifire |
[PISSN] 0302-0142
[NCID] AN00136225
|
Abstract |
According to interviews on internal resource allocation models (RAMs) with representatives from ten Japanese comprehensive national universities, the following facts were revealed. Firstly, annual departmental budgets tend to be decided by institutional central offices with rather formulaic approaches and with no official process to respond to departmental requests. However, departments tend to be able to use allocated budgets at their full discretion. Secondly, the categorization of universities (research-led, strong in specific fields and regionally contributing) launched by Japanese Ministry of Education (the MEXT) since the beginning of the third management cycle (FY2016-2021) did not have a significant influence on their RAMs.
However, this policy tool reduced each universityʼs block grant by 0.8-1.6% every year. Under such circumstances, more than a few universities cut the same rate of departmental budgets for research. Thirdly, the redistribution of the block grant among the universities with the assessment of the common performance metrics had a strong influence on their RAMs. All the universities introduced similar budget redistribution schemes with the same metrics internally. However, some universities set a small portion of their departmental budget aside and redistributed it to their departments based on performance metrics. Others did not set it aside and simply added a part of their presidential discretionary budget to specific departments based on the metrics. Overall, this redistribution of the block grant was unpopular since it was suddenly introduced in the middle of the universitiesʼ management cycle, and intruded on institutional budgetary affairs. Based on two qualitative comparative analyses (QCA), the following facts were revealed. The universities with comparative advantage in terms of their scale, public resource dependency and research competitiveness have leeway to set a part of departmental budget aside for their internal redistribution and to have more realistic departmental budget formulae responding to departmental demands. However, those with comparative disadvantage do not have leeway to do the same things. All in all, the current block grant redistribution schemes with institutional performance may widen institutional disparities among Japanese national universities. |
Descriptions |
2022年5月29日に行われた日本高等教育学会第25回大会での報告内容を論文化したもの
|
Language |
jpn
|
Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
Publisher |
広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University
|
Date of Issued | 2023-03 |
Rights |
Copyright (c) 2023 by Author
|
Publish Type | Version of Record |
Access Rights | open access |