Addressing Methodological Challenges in Comparative Law Research
廣島法學 44 巻 4 号
168-128 頁
2021-03-10 発行
アクセス数 : 268 件
ダウンロード数 : 196 件
今月のアクセス数 : 0 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 2 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/50937
ファイル情報(添付) |
HLJ_44-4_168.pdf
474 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
Addressing Methodological Challenges in Comparative Law Research
|
作成者 | |
収録物名 |
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
|
巻 | 44 |
号 | 4 |
開始ページ | 168 |
終了ページ | 128 |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|
抄録 |
Comparative law is a field of study whose object is the comparison of legal systems with a view to obtaining knowledge that may be used for a variety of theoretical and practical purposes. It embraces: the comparing of legal systems with the purpose of ascertaining their differences and similarities; the systematic analysis and evaluation of the solutions which two or more systems offer for a particular legal problem; and the treatment of methodological problems that arise in connection with the comparative process and the study of foreign law. One type of interest pertaining to knowledge and explanation in comparative law is associated with the traditional comparison de lege lata and/or de lege ferenda. Pursuant to this comparison are searches for models for the formulation of new legislative policies at a domestic, regional or international level. Comparative law can also be a valuable tool when courts and other authorities interpret and apply legal rules or are faced with the task of filling gaps in legislation or case law. However, when carrying out their tasks, comparative law researchers are often faced with vexing methodological problems. Some of these problems pertain to difficulties in establishing the so-called tertium comparationis – the common denominator between the legal rules or institutions under consideration that makes comparison possible. This paper examines some key aspects of comparative law methodology, with particular attention being paid to the normative-dogmatic and functional approaches to the comparability issue. It is submitted that, depending on the demands and goals of the particular research project, combining elements of these two approaches may provide a useful way of addressing some of the methodological challenges that arise in the context of comparative law research.
|
言語 |
英語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学法学会
|
発行日 | 2021-03-10 |
権利情報 |
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 0386-5010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|