Addressing Methodological Challenges in Comparative Law Research

廣島法學 Volume 44 Issue 4 Page 168-128 published_at 2021-03-10
アクセス数 : 224
ダウンロード数 : 128

今月のアクセス数 : 2
今月のダウンロード数 : 7
File
HLJ_44-4_168.pdf 474 KB 種類 : fulltext
Title ( eng )
Addressing Methodological Challenges in Comparative Law Research
Creator
Source Title
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
Volume 44
Issue 4
Start Page 168
End Page 128
Journal Identifire
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
Abstract
Comparative law is a field of study whose object is the comparison of legal systems with a view to obtaining knowledge that may be used for a variety of theoretical and practical purposes. It embraces: the comparing of legal systems with the purpose of ascertaining their differences and similarities; the systematic analysis and evaluation of the solutions which two or more systems offer for a particular legal problem; and the treatment of methodological problems that arise in connection with the comparative process and the study of foreign law. One type of interest pertaining to knowledge and explanation in comparative law is associated with the traditional comparison de lege lata and/or de lege ferenda. Pursuant to this comparison are searches for models for the formulation of new legislative policies at a domestic, regional or international level. Comparative law can also be a valuable tool when courts and other authorities interpret and apply legal rules or are faced with the task of filling gaps in legislation or case law. However, when carrying out their tasks, comparative law researchers are often faced with vexing methodological problems. Some of these problems pertain to difficulties in establishing the so-called tertium comparationis – the common denominator between the legal rules or institutions under consideration that makes comparison possible. This paper examines some key aspects of comparative law methodology, with particular attention being paid to the normative-dogmatic and functional approaches to the comparability issue. It is submitted that, depending on the demands and goals of the particular research project, combining elements of these two approaches may provide a useful way of addressing some of the methodological challenges that arise in the context of comparative law research.
Language
eng
Resource Type departmental bulletin paper
Publisher
広島大学法学会
Date of Issued 2021-03-10
Rights
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
Publish Type Version of Record
Access Rights open access
Source Identifier
[ISSN] 0386-5010
[NCID] AN0021395X