知的所有権制度における正義の考察 : ロールズとノージックの理論を通して

倫理学研究 26 号 15-23 頁 2020-03-31 発行
アクセス数 : 337
ダウンロード数 : 162

今月のアクセス数 : 8
今月のダウンロード数 : 5
ファイル情報(添付)
JourEthicalStudies_26_15.pdf 1.64 MB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( jpn )
知的所有権制度における正義の考察 : ロールズとノージックの理論を通して
タイトル ( eng )
Consideration of Justice in the Intellectual Property System: Rawls’s and Nozick’s Theories
作成者
余 佳城
収録物名
倫理学研究
The Journal of Ethical Studies
26
開始ページ 15
終了ページ 23
抄録
Intellectual property rights have a monopoly during their validity period, which is protected by the legal system. This monopoly causes unfairness, which is also a problem of justice in the intellectual property system. In this paper, we first identify the purpose of setting up the intellectual property system, which is to promote the development of the cultural industry, and the design concept of the intellectual property system, which is based on Locke’s labor value theory, i.e., the prior intellectual property system recognizes the core position of labor value in intellectual property. Labor is human labor, which basically depends on human talents; therefore, the value of labor basically depends on human talents. Nozick believes that human talents are completely personal; thus, the labor results based on talents should also belong to individuals. This view is considered to be liberalism. The advantage of liberalism is that it stimulates individual talents to create value and then promotes the development of industry and culture. However, Rawls believes that human talents should be seen as not a personal resource, but a social resource. Therefore, the country should implement a certain degree of redistribution of the income gap caused by the value created by human talent. Rawls proposed the “principle of justice,” which embodies both the spirits of liberalism and egalitarianism. The validity period of intellectual property rights protection is based on this concept, which considers not only efficiency but also a certain degree of equality. This is the justice of the intellectual property system. The justice of intellectual property rights also shows that it is not appropriate to treat intellectual property rights as equal to property rights, which is an excessive claim for intellectual property rights.
内容記述
本論文は中国国家留学基金の奨学金を受けた研究成果の一部である。
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
中四国倫理学研究会
発行日 2020-03-31
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 0916-247X
[NCID] AN10092749