プロフェッショナル・スピーチ(専門職言論)の類型化の意義 : 知識コミュニティ理論からのアプローチ
廣島法學 43 巻 4 号
166-127 頁
2020-03-17 発行
アクセス数 : 545 件
ダウンロード数 : 203 件
今月のアクセス数 : 10 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 6 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/49259
ファイル情報(添付) |
HLJ_43-4_166.pdf
1.31 MB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
プロフェッショナル・スピーチ(専門職言論)の類型化の意義 : 知識コミュニティ理論からのアプローチ
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
The Meaning of Categorizing Professional Speech
|
作成者 | |
収録物名 |
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
|
巻 | 43 |
号 | 4 |
開始ページ | 166 |
終了ページ | 127 |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|
抄録 |
Professionals advise their clients. Does this advice constitute professional conduct or speech? Professional advice is speech that is protected under the First Amendment, but at the same time, professional conduct can be regulated by the states, so professional speech can, incidentally, be involved in such regulation. Many lower courts and scholars adopt this view, and thus, professional speech receives less protection than other speech does. However, professional speech should not be treated as having less protection under the First Amendment. The distinctive character of professional speech is its nexus with the knowledge community. Professionals belong to the knowledge community. The knowledge community creates and maintains professional insights, and each profession conveys its insights to its clients. The interests of the professional speech of the knowledge community are combined with the standpoint that the protection of free speech is not only a subjective right but also an objective right. This way of thinking can provide a new perspective on restraining government discretion.
|
内容記述 |
本研究はJSPS科研費JP19K01299の助成を受けたものです。
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学法学会
|
発行日 | 2020-03-17 |
権利情報 |
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 0386-5010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|