現代ギリシア語における間接的な要因による主語・定動詞倒置 : レ[焦点+主語+定動詞] 対 *[CLLD+焦点+主語+定動詞]

プロピレア Issue 24 Page 1-18 published_at 2018-08-31
アクセス数 : 617
ダウンロード数 : 64

今月のアクセス数 : 6
今月のダウンロード数 : 0
File
Propylaia_24_1.pdf 504 KB 種類 : fulltext
Title ( jpn )
現代ギリシア語における間接的な要因による主語・定動詞倒置 : レ[焦点+主語+定動詞] 対 *[CLLD+焦点+主語+定動詞]
Title ( eng )
Indirectly Triggered Subject-Verb Inversion in Modern Greek: レ[Focus+Subject+V] vs. *[CLLD+Focus+Subject+V]
Creator
Ishioka Seizo
Source Title
プロピレア
PROPYLAIA
Issue 24
Start Page 1
End Page 18
Journal Identifire
[PISSN] 0915-7425
[EISSN] 2759-6494
[NCID] AN10424929
Abstract
This paper elucidates the adjacency requirement between a preposed focus phrase and the finite verb, proposing a series of hypotheses to account for the existence of the following three groups of Modern Greek speakers (A, B, and C):
(1) Group A:
a. ti NINA o Yorghos tha feri.
b. ston PAVLO ktes edose i Maria ta lefta.
(2) Group B:
a. to MORO o Yiorghos frondise?
b.*o YIORGHOS to moro to-frondise.
(3) Group C:
a.*to GLIKO o Janis efaje.
b.*o JANIS to gliko to-efaje.
Based on Relativized Minimality defined on Full Match in (4) and (5), we assume the basic premises embodied in the assignment of the features [+Op(erator)] and [+D(Linked)]:
(4) A. Preposed focus XP's are assigned the feature [+Op], [[±] and the feature [+Op][+D]].
B. Preposed subjects are assigned the feature the feature [+Op][+D]/[+Op].
C. CLLD's are assigned the feature [+Op][+D], [[±[and the feature [+Op]].
(5) X Z Y chain formation
a. +α +α +α *
b. +α,+β +α +α,+β レ
c. +α +β +α レ
d. +α +α,+β +α *
In Group A and Group B, in which preposed focus XP's are endowed with the feature [+Op][+D]/[+Op], (1a) and (2a) are predicted to be grammatical, owing to the scheme in (5b). In Group C, in which preposed focus XP's are given the feature [+Op], (3a) is rejected, because of the scheme in (5a) or (5d). CLLD's are assigned the feature [+Op][+D]/[+Op] in Group A, while the feature [+Op][+D], leading to acceptance of (1b) (scheme (5b)) or to rejection of (2b) and (3b) (scheme (5a) or (5d)). The same strategy accounts for the difference in (6a) and (6b), since (6a), where subject-verb does not apply, is rejected by Relativized Minimality.
(6) a.*[to vivlio]i stin MARIA o Yiorghos toi-edhikse.
b. [to vivlio]i stin MARIA toi-edhikse o Yiorghos.
NDC
Other minor languages [ 890 ]
Language
jpn
Resource Type journal article
Publisher
日本ギリシア語ギリシア文学会
Date of Issued 2018-08-31
Rights
Copyright (c) 2018 日本ギリシア語ギリシア文学会
Publish Type Version of Record
Access Rights open access
Source Identifier
[ISSN] 0915-7425
[NCID] AN10424929