人種中立的手段優先使用原則の理論的背景 : 人種間の分断・対立の抑止と厳格審査

Theoretical Background of Narrow-tailoring Inquiry in Affirmative Action Cases

Saijo Jun

廣島法學

The Hiroshima Law Journal

[ISSN] 03865010

[NCID] AN0021395X

The U.S. Supreme Court’s affirmative action decisions in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin highlighted the significance of race-neutral alternatives to racebased admissions plans. In that decision, the Court held that state universities engaging in race-based affirmative action programs bear the burden of demonstrating that available and workable race-neutral alternatives do not suffice. This article argues that this is because race-neutral alternatives enable governmental actors to increase diversity and promote equal opportunity without racial balkanization. The Article also makes clear that in the narrow-tailoring inquiry, the Court requires affirmative action programs to not exhibit excessive race-consciousness so as to minimize the likelihood of racial balkanization.

Law [ 320 ]

jpn

広島大学法学会

許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる。

[ISSN] 0386-5010

[NCID] AN0021395X