『私を離さないで』 における疑似イングリッシュネス : 小説とヘリテージ映画を読む/ 見る

英語英文學研究 62 巻 73-90 頁 2018-03-30 発行
アクセス数 : 1073
ダウンロード数 : 3807

今月のアクセス数 : 2
今月のダウンロード数 : 15
ファイル情報(添付)
タイトル ( jpn )
『私を離さないで』 における疑似イングリッシュネス : 小説とヘリテージ映画を読む/ 見る
タイトル ( eng )
Pseudo-Englishness in Never Let Me Go: a Reading and Viewing of the Novel and Heritage Film
作成者
金子 幸男
収録物名
英語英文學研究
Hiroshima studies in English language and literature
62
開始ページ 73
終了ページ 90
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 02882876
[NCID] AN0002064X
抄録
Both the novel and the film, Never Let Me Go, depict the recognizable settings of Englishness, including the country house, the cottage, the NHS-like hospital, the seaside resort and the Norfolk countryside. However, a strange feeling possesses us when reading the novel or viewing the film, which prevents us from calling it a genuine novel of Englishness, or a genuine heritage film.
The purpose of this thesis is to identify why we feel a sense of ‘strangeness’ when we read the novel and view the film adaptation. I conclude that this feeling is produced by the pseudo-Englishness, which characterizes this work in both narrative formats. Both formats deepen our understanding of this pseudo-English world. Indeed, it is full of the images of Englishness, but as the main characters are clones, we cannot ask about their English identity, only about their ‘Hailshamness’. Thus, we cannot find any comfort in finding feelings of nostalgia for the English past in the story and in wishing to return to the classic English tradition. I discuss, first, the nature of the heritage film and a map representing Englishness, followed by the Hailsham boarding school, a cottage, a recovery centre and a stranded fishing boat, a seaside resort town and, lastly, the Norfolk countryside.
The heritage film deals with the heritage and identity of England, and the film’s key features are the past, the manners and proprieties of upper and upper middle-class English society, country houses, rolling green landscapes of southern England, period costume and canonical literary films. This genre was created when Thatcherism in the 1980s caused declining community bonds and social unrest.
Miss Emily, head guardian at Hailsham, teaches the clone students about the counties of England, using maps and a picture calendar. Picturesque villages, streams, and old churches, all suggest that this novel deals with the theme of Englishness. The film does not show us any such geographical scenes, but the total visual effect suggests the theme of Englishness.
The Hailsham boarding school is depicted as an English country house. Although it has generally been open to the surrounding local society, Hailsham is a closed world, which gives us a sense of ‘strangeness’. The students are forced to stay inside, and they do not have any family names; thus, they do not belong to any family pedigree. Quarterly Exchanges and monthly Sales emulate the economic system of the outside world, but such emulation is meaningless, as the clones maintain few contacts with the outside world during their short lives. What they acquired at the Exchanges and the Sales―their possessions―help the clones form individual identities and develop sense of belonging to Hailsham, (i.e. Hailshamness).
After Hailsham, they move to a cottage, which was formerly a farm house. The cottage, which evokes pastoral Englishness, is in fact a place of anxiety. Contrary to our expectations, we see a pseudo-pastoral world. No agrarian labour such as haymaking, harvesting, or milking is described, and sheep are not foregrounded. Food comes only from the outside. It is as if the clones are themselves like cattle. Deprived of reproductive abilities, they are inferior to cattle, resulting in no family pedigree and no heritage. Their failure to contact their possibles (originals) means that they cannot enter into normal human society and are doomed to confinement. Thus, the clones feel fear and unrest despite the superficial pleasantness of their pastoral life―this gives us a feeling of ‘strangeness’.
The story then moves from the Cottages to a hospital called the recovery centre, which aims to enable the clones to recovery after their donations. Seemingly a very English institution, this NHS-like institution is pseudo-English as medical welfare depends on the pathetic sacrifice of clones who are indistinct from human beings. They are like humans not only in their feelings but also in their memories. This is illustrated by a stranded fishing boat, which they visit and find beauty in since it is nothing other than a figure of the now-closed Hailsham.
Tommy and Kathy visit a seaside resort town―an English town that has been a place of middle-class wealth and a place to find leisure in since the 19th century―to see Miss Emily and Madame, and to ask for a deferral of donation by showing Tommy’s painting as proof of his soul. However, his request is not granted, and both are doomed. This sad fate is incompatible with the pleasant English image of a seaside resort, which leaves us with a feeling of strangeness.
The last scene is set in the English countryside of Norfolk. This final setting should be idyllic, but instead, it has an elegiac atmosphere, as it is like a graveyard for the clones, and Kathy is the only observer.
In conclusion, Norfolk serves as a home and graveyard for the clones. However, the fact that there is no photo of Norfolk in Miss Emily’s geography lesson suggests that the English do not want to accept clones as part of their society.
内容記述
本稿は,日本英文学会中国四国支部第69回支部大会(2016年10月30日,愛媛大学)のシンポジウム「Kazuo Ishiguro 再考――さらなる解釈の可能性を求めて」において発表した原稿に加筆修正を加えたものである。
NDC分類
英米文学 [ 930 ]
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
広島大学英文学会
発行日 2018-03-30
権利情報
著作権は、執筆者本人と広島大学英文学会に帰属する
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 0288-2876
[NCID] AN0002064X