民法第242条の要件に関する一考察
廣島法學 41 巻 4 号
130-110 頁
2018-03-05 発行
アクセス数 : 870 件
ダウンロード数 : 7796 件
今月のアクセス数 : 0 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 3 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/45740
ファイル情報(添付) |
HLJ_41-4_130.pdf
843 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
民法第242条の要件に関する一考察
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
The requirements of Article 242 of the Civil Code
|
作成者 |
坂井 智典
|
収録物名 |
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
|
巻 | 41 |
号 | 4 |
開始ページ | 130 |
終了ページ | 110 |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|
抄録 |
Article 242 of the Civil Code in Japan states that “the owner of real estate shall acquire ownership in a Thing that has been attached thereto as its accessory.” However, it is not necessarily clear in what sort of situations certain objects are determined to be attached to real estate as an accessory. Thus, various interpretations regarding the circumstances in which something and another thing are recognized as “being attached” have been asserted. Nevertheless, none of these interpretations provide any uniform understanding of court cases from the Supreme Court. While there are various cases discussing whether the rule of attachment to real estate is applicable or not, it has been pointed out that measuring whether something is attached or not with a single scale is indeed problematic. However, reflecting on the fundamental principles of interpretation and examining the requirements given in Article 242 of the Civil Code and then adding the distribution of the burden of proof, it is perhaps possible to understand the determination of the Supreme Court in a uniform fashion. From this perspective, this study explores the possibility of an interpretation that allows for a uniform understanding of Supreme Court rulings.
|
NDC分類 |
法律 [ 320 ]
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学法学会
|
発行日 | 2018-03-05 |
権利情報 |
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる。
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 0386-5010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|