WHYを含む中日多重WH疑問文の統語論・意味論について

アクセス数 : 1105
ダウンロード数 : 648

今月のアクセス数 : 13
今月のダウンロード数 : 6
ファイル情報(添付)
StudiesInHumanSciences_12_63.pdf 940 KB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( jpn )
WHYを含む中日多重WH疑問文の統語論・意味論について
タイトル ( eng )
Comparative Syntactic and Semantic Study of Multiple Wh-Questions with ‘Why’ in Japanese and Chinese
作成者
杜 暁磊
収録物名
広島大学大学院総合科学研究科紀要. I, 人間科学研究
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University. I, Studies in human sciences
12
開始ページ 63
終了ページ 75
抄録
The differences in the restrictions on multiple-wh-questions in Chinese and Japanese appear strange. On the one hand, at least one nominal wh-phrase (nani (‘what’) or dare (‘who’)) must precede the adverbial wh-phrase naze (‘why’) in Japanese. On the other hand, in Chinese, multiple-wh-questions are permitted only in embedded sentences, and never in monoclausal sentences. Moreover, ‘why’ takes the narrow scope, whereas nominal wh-phrases take wide scope in the semantic interpretation. In this paper, a new syntactic and semantic analysis is developed to investigate the differences between Japanese and Chinese, and the characteristics of naze.
In Japanese, wh-phrases employ covert movement. The Q (question)-operator of a nominal wh-phrase directly merges in DP/PP, and the Q-operator of the adverbial wh-phrase naze appears in Spec CP. Therefore, nominal wh-phrases and naze can coexist in monoclausal sentences. In contrast to the case in Japanese of covert movement of wh-phrases, in Chinese, feature movement is applied to wh-phrases, and the Q-operators of both nominal wh-phrases and naze are present in Spec CP. Therefore, nominal wh-phrases and naze cannot co-occur in monoclausal sentences where only one Spec CP is included. However, they can co-occur in monoclausal sentences where two Spec CPs are included.
Due to its semantic characteristics, ‘why’ cannot take other wh-questions in its scope. We also find that the above-mentioned restrictions in Japanese apply to the linear order of wh-phrases, because the preceding wh-phrases take wide scope, while these restrictions for Chinese language appear in the differences between monoclausal sentences and embedded sentences instead of the linear order.
著者キーワード
syntax
semantics
why
multiple whquestions
NDC分類
英語 [ 830 ]
中国語 [ 820 ]
日本語 [ 810 ]
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
広島大学大学院総合科学研究科
発行日 2017-12-31
権利情報
掲載された論文,研究ノート,要旨などの出版権・著作権は広島大学大学院総合科学研究科に帰属する。
Copyright (c) 2017 Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, All rights reserved.
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 1881-7688
[NCID] AA12198647