チャンキャ・ロルペードルジェ『知見の歌』研究序説

比較論理学研究 14 号 57-68 頁 2017-03-25 発行
アクセス数 : 1131
ダウンロード数 : 535

今月のアクセス数 : 3
今月のダウンロード数 : 5
ファイル情報(添付)
タイトル ( jpn )
チャンキャ・ロルペードルジェ『知見の歌』研究序説
タイトル ( eng )
An introduction to the study of Lcang skya rol pa’i rdo rje’s Lta mgur
作成者
収録物名
比較論理学研究
The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic
14
開始ページ 57
終了ページ 68
収録物識別子
[PISSN] 1880-6376
[NCID] AA12025285
抄録
Lcang skya rol pa’i rdo rje’s (1717–1786) Lta mgur, a collection of songs on the correct view, is a short but seminal work that expresses the idea of emptiness and dependent origination. A characteristic feature of the Lta mgur is the frequent usage of metaphors. Throughout the work, the author uses the metaphor of “old mother” (a ma rgan mo) to describe emptiness, and that of “brother” (jo jo) to describe dependent origination; the author himself is described metaphorically as “mad little son” (bu chung smyon pa). The Lta mgur provides a vivid description of the process by which the author recognizes (ngo shes) his missing mother, i.e., emptiness, with the assistance of his brother, i.e., the reasoning of dependent origination.
The Lta mgur was composed in 1767 CE when Lcang skya rol pa’i rdo rje was fifty-one years old and staying at Mt. Wutai (Ri bo rtse lnga). Shortly after that, several commentaries were written by his successors belonging to both Dge lugs pa and non-Dge lugs pa schools, each from different viewpoints. First, Dkon mchog ’jigs med dbang po (1728–1791), one of Lcang skya rol pa’i rdo rje’s disciples, composed a commentary from the viewpoint of Madhyamaka philosophy. Then, another Dge lugs pa scholar, Khri chen bstan pa rab rgyas (1759–1815/16) interpreted the Lta mgur from the perspective of Tantra, and hence was criticized by Dbal mang dkon mchog rgyal mtshan (1764–1853). Furthermore, two commentaries on the Lta mgur were written by Rnying ma pa scholars: Kaḥ thog dge rtse mahāpaṇḍita ’gyur med tshe dbang mchog grub (1761–1829) believed that the idea underlying the Lta mgur was none other than “Great Perfection” (rdzogs chen), while Mi pham ’jam dbyangs rnam rgyal rgya mtsho (1846–1912) analyzed the same text in the context of the non-sectarian movement (ris med).
Thus, it is interesting to observe that, although the author himself belongs to Dge lugs pa, scholars both inside and outside that tradition accept his Lta mgur. The abundant usage of symbolic expressions has allowed the Lta mgur to be interpreted diversely.
内容記述
広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター研究成果報告書(2016年度)
NDC分類
中国文学 [ 920 ]
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
広島大学比較論理学プロジェクト研究センター
発行日 2017-03-25
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 1880-6376
[NCID] AA12025285