戦後大学改革期の学生参加論 その1 : 大学法試案要綱発表から公聴会の計画まで
大学論集 Issue 49
Page 161-176
published_at 2017-03
アクセス数 : 892 件
ダウンロード数 : 224 件
今月のアクセス数 : 3 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 1 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/42970
File |
DaigakuRonshu_49_161.pdf
706 KB
種類 :
fulltext
|
Title ( jpn ) |
戦後大学改革期の学生参加論 その1 : 大学法試案要綱発表から公聴会の計画まで
|
Title ( eng ) |
A Study of the Argument over Student Participation in the Period of University Reform in Japan after World War II (Part 1) Focusing on the Discussions around 1950
|
Creator |
Hirouchi Daisuke
|
Source Title |
大学論集
Daigaku ronshu: Research in higher education
|
Issue | 49 |
Start Page | 161 |
End Page | 176 |
Journal Identifire |
[PISSN] 0302-0142
[NCID] AN00136225
|
Abstract |
This study reveals the series of discussions over student participation in the period of university reform in Japan after World WarⅡ. It especially focuses on the confrontation in the period from October, 1948 to October, 1950 and clarifies the details of the counter proposals to the draft outline of the University Law (Daigaku-ho Shian Yoko) made by the Japan Teachers' Union (Nikkyoso) and the National Federation of Students' Self-government Associations (Zengakuren).
Next, it examines many of the primary historical materials owned by the National Institute for Educational Policy Research (NIER) and presents specific opinions on student participation both from supporters and opponents and sheds light on the process which established the student participation clause in a sequence of deliberations of the Drafting Council of the Bill of National University Administration (Kokuritsu Daigaku Kanri Hoan Kiso Kyogikai). In the conclusion, three points are made: 1) Before enactment of the first draft of the bill of National University Administration, more idealistic student participation proposal had been discussed with concrete articles; 2)seemingly progressive student participation clause is a step backwards compared with earlier deliberation. That is, it is misunderstanding that the existing of the clause is an evidence of positive support for student participation; 3) the word “administration” (kanri) caused the committee to regard the bill as one that covered only administrative issues and the students, target of education, were expelled from the area. |
NDC |
Education [ 370 ]
|
Language |
jpn
|
Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
Publisher |
広島大学高等教育研究開発センター
|
Date of Issued | 2017-03 |
Rights |
Copyright (c) 2017 by Author
|
Publish Type | Version of Record |
Access Rights | open access |
Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 0302-0142
[NCID] AN00136225
|