動力学的力と力学的力 : カントの力の理論

HABITUS 21 巻 27-42 頁 2017-03-23 発行
アクセス数 : 927
ダウンロード数 : 337

今月のアクセス数 : 4
今月のダウンロード数 : 4
ファイル情報(添付)
HABITUS_21_27.pdf 1.19 MB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( jpn )
動力学的力と力学的力 : カントの力の理論
タイトル ( eng )
Dynamical and Mechanical Force: Kant's Theory of Physical Force
作成者
嶋崎 太一
収録物名
HABITUS
21
開始ページ 27
終了ページ 42
収録物識別子
[PISSN] 2186-7909
[NCID] AA12942536
抄録
Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786) consists of four chapters: Phoronomy, Dynamics, Mechanics, and Phenomenology. Force, the key concept of his theory of physics, is discussed in Dynamics and Mechanics. The distinction between dynamical and mechanical force is one of the crucial points of Kant's physics in the critical period. He argues that all mechanical laws presuppose dynamical laws because the former treat a moving force as matter moving through dynamical force. In this paper, I examine the historical background and the source of these distinctions. In contemporary physics, mechanics is the science of the moving body in general, and includes dynamics and statics. However, in Kant's period, the position of these disciplines in physics was not clear. Kant's Essay on Living Forces refers to both dynamics and mechanics, but this terminology is influenced by Wolff, who used both terms without clear classification. Given this situation in the pre-critical period, Kant's system, which claims that dynamics is superior to mechanics, is not consistent with his young age. He had noted two methods of physics, that is, dynamical and mechanical methods, in his lectures of metaphysics since the 1770s. The mechanical method, that is atomistic "Corpuscular philosophy", is represented by Epicurus and Descartes, while the dynamical approach is founded by Newton, and assumes the immanent force. In the 1780s, Kant argued that mechanical methods presupposed hypothetical absolute density and absolute empty. The model for the mechanical method is the theory of the confliction of perfectly elastic bodies. However, he accepted, even during his pre-critical periods, that a gravitational "action in distance" is unable to be explained by the model of confliction. Hence, it is necessary for his physics to assume the original immanent force. Thus, he must distinguish the mechanical force (F=mv) from the dynamical original force.
NDC分類
西洋哲学 [ 130 ]
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 学術雑誌論文
出版者
西日本応用倫理学研究会
発行日 2017-03-23
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 2186-7909