ザンビア共和国における理科の授業研究協議会の実態と課題 : 発話のカテゴリー分析と質的分析を用いて
国際協力研究誌 23 巻 1・2 号
55-74 頁
2017-03-01 発行
アクセス数 : 945 件
ダウンロード数 : 333 件
今月のアクセス数 : 6 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 1 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/42499
ファイル情報(添付) |
JIDC_23-1_55.pdf
753 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
ザンビア共和国における理科の授業研究協議会の実態と課題 : 発話のカテゴリー分析と質的分析を用いて
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
Current Status and Challenges of Science Lesson Study Discussion in Zambia : Analysis by Categorization of Contents and Qualitative Approaches
|
作成者 |
中里 春菜
|
収録物名 |
国際協力研究誌
Journal of International Development and Cooperation
|
巻 | 23 |
号 | 1・2 |
開始ページ | 55 |
終了ページ | 74 |
抄録 |
The purpose of this paper is to investigate current status and challenges of the lesson study discussion in Zambia. Nine cases of the post discussion on a subject of secondary science were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively through (1) categorizing what they discussed, (2) clearing the dependency on an evaluation sheet, (3) detecting the discussion of lesson objective and (4) detecting a critical reflection. Firstly, the categories consist of “Teacher”, “Student”, “Contents”, “Facilitation language” and “Others”. Overall, “others” occupy most time than any other categories in a discussion. It includes discussion such as confirming the way of lesson study and how to use the evaluation sheet. Furthermore, these topics were not generated based on what they observed in the lesson. Actually they were supposed to be understood before. This is the result which no one has ever pointed out before. Comparing the case of secondary school with that of primary school, the former spent much more time than the latter. Again the time taken for “others” was also more in secondary schools. Secondary, the teachers tend to share the final judgement in the evaluation without discussing its reasons. Thirdly, a lesson objective was not discussed enough and the teachers tend to evaluate the lesson positively on the evaluation sheet. Lastly, critical discussion hardly occurred. The result of analysis lead to the following two suggestions: (1) teachers should intentionally talk about the reasons and the process of their final judgement on the evaluation sheet; and (2) teachers should keep questioning critically the viewpoints of lesson evaluation so that they will be able to renew and reconstruct the ideal image of lessons for sure. For the further tasks, provisions to the identified challenges should be investigated to improve the quality of lesson study discussion.
|
内容記述 |
本研究は国連大学の「アフリカでのグローバル人材養成プログラム」の助成を受けたものである。
|
NDC分類 |
教育 [ 370 ]
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学大学院国際協力研究科
|
発行日 | 2017-03-01 |
権利情報 |
Copyright (c) 2017 Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation Hiroshima University. 本紀要の一部・全部を問わず、著作権者(広島大学大学院国際協力研究科)の文章による許諾なしに複写・翻訳することを禁じます。
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 1341-0903
[NCID] AN10482914
|
備考 | 誤記訂正のため、最終ページに正誤表を追加。(2020年11月19日) |