核兵器不拡散条約における北朝鮮の法的地位
廣島法學 40 巻 2 号
196-166 頁
2016-10-28 発行
アクセス数 : 1375 件
ダウンロード数 : 1816 件
今月のアクセス数 : 3 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 15 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/41669
ファイル情報(添付) |
HLJ_40-2_196.pdf
682 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
核兵器不拡散条約における北朝鮮の法的地位
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
Legal Status of North Korea under the Non-Proliferation Treaty
|
作成者 |
石神 輝雄
|
収録物名 |
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
|
巻 | 40 |
号 | 2 |
開始ページ | 196 |
終了ページ | 166 |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|
抄録 |
This paper examines the legal status of North Korea under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Some argue that North Korea has already withdrawn from the NPT, but for others, it remains a party. This division among international lawyers stems from a fundamental legal issue concerning whether the exercise of the withdrawal clause stipulated in Article 10 of the NPT is only subject to the subjective judgment of withdrawal states. Traditionally, the right to withdraw from disarmament and arms control treaties has been considered a sovereign right, and therefore does not require any acceptance or approval from other treaty parties nor to be reviewed by any international institutions. If one maintains this conventional approach, even in the case of withdrawal from the NPT, which is now almost universally recognized as the cornerstone of the non-nuclear proliferation regime, there is no room to ask whether North Korea is still under the obligations of the NPT. In recent years, however, there have been growing concerns regarding the use of the right to withdraw. Furthermore, there are doubts that the right should not be considered to exclude scrutiny from other international subjects since North Korea declared to exercise her right to withdraw from the NPT in 1993 and 2003. The declaration has revealed that the NPT has a loophole in which a malevolent contracting state could abuse the rights of nonnuclear state protected under NPT to develop a nuclear weapon program. This paper argues that the right to withdraw from the NPT is not only subject to the intention of the withdrawal state but arguably to the judgment of other relevant institutions - in the case of the NPT, the United Nations Security Council.
|
NDC分類 |
法律 [ 320 ]
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 紀要論文 |
出版者 |
広島大学法学会
|
発行日 | 2016-10-28 |
権利情報 |
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる。
|
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 0386-5010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|