Practical Use of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation for Severe ARDS : a preliminary report in comparison with a conventional ventilatory support
Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences Volume 58 Issue 4
Page 83-88
published_at 2009-12
アクセス数 : 1425 件
ダウンロード数 : 238 件
今月のアクセス数 : 8 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 4 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00034971
File |
HiroshimaJMedSci_58_83.pdf
1.28 MB
種類 :
fulltext
|
Title ( eng ) |
Practical Use of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation for Severe ARDS : a preliminary report in comparison with a conventional ventilatory support
|
Creator |
Liu Liangji
Ota Kohei
Tamura Tomoko
Yamaga Satoshi
Kida Yoshiko
Kondo Tomohiro
Ishida Makoto
Tsumura Ryu
Takeda Taku
|
Source Title |
Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences
|
Volume | 58 |
Issue | 4 |
Start Page | 83 |
End Page | 88 |
Journal Identifire |
[PISSN] 0018-2052
[EISSN] 2433-7668
[NCID] AA00664312
|
Abstract |
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a ventilatory mode that allows unsupported spontaneous breathing at any phase of the ventilatory cycle with high mean airway pressures. We hypothesized that use of APRV might produce potential beneficial effects on oxygenation, reducing mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in comparison with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) as a conventional mode of ventilation. We retrospectively reviewed data of 58 patients with severe ARDS (the ratios of partial arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen, PaOz/F102 ratio <150). The patients' data were divided into two groups: SIMV-group and APRV-group. Patients' backgrounds, oxygenation on day 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 following initiation of each mode, vasopressor dependence, duration of ventilation, duration of ICU stay, and mortality in ICU were analyzed. PaOz/F102 ratios were statistically higher in the APRV-group (APRV vs. SIMV on day 1, 3, 5, 7: 201.6 ± 76 vs.150 ± 59.1, 256.7 ± 71.5 vs.182.1 ± 65.4, 268.8 ± 73.3 vs. 204.6 ± 72.8, and 263 ± 74.5 vs.204.1 ± 67.1, respectively, p<0.05). Vasopressors were less used (p=0.018), and mortality in ICU tended to be lower in the APRV group (31 %) than in the SIMV group (59%) (p=0.050).
Use of APRV in patients with severe ARDS appears to be associated with improvements in oxygenation, and a trend toward lower mortality in ICU. No significant adverse effects were observed. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm the benefits of this ventilatory mode in comparison with conventional methods for severe ARDS. |
Keywords |
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Airway pressure release ventilation
Mechanical ventilation
|
NDC |
Medical sciences [ 490 ]
|
Language |
eng
|
Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
Publisher |
Hiroshima University Medical Press
|
Date of Issued | 2009-12 |
Rights |
(c) Hiroshima University Medical Press.
|
Publish Type | Version of Record |
Access Rights | open access |
Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 0018-2052
[NCID] AA00664312
|