Community Participation in Decentralized Rural Development : A Case Study of Three Villages in Purbalingga District, Indonesia <Article>
国際協力研究誌 Volume 18 Issue 3
Page 99-110
published_at 2012-03-31
アクセス数 : 1253 件
ダウンロード数 : 203 件
今月のアクセス数 : 17 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 4 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/32476
File |
JIDC_18-3_99.pdf
199 KB
種類 :
fulltext
|
Title ( eng ) |
Community Participation in Decentralized Rural Development : A Case Study of Three Villages in Purbalingga District, Indonesia <Article>
|
Creator |
Sutiyo
|
Source Title |
国際協力研究誌
Journal of International Development and Cooperation
|
Volume | 18 |
Issue | 3 |
Start Page | 99 |
End Page | 110 |
Abstract |
After a long time practice of centralized rural development, the government of Indonesia in 2001 applied decentralized system and transferred the authorities on planning, execution and evaluation of rural development to village government. Designed to promote community participation, the system aims to replace the state led rural development previously applied. However, after the authorities were transferred, there is a question whether the system can really facilitate community participation. This study analyzes community participation in Indonesian decentralized system by focusing on rural development planning, execution and evaluation. Case study was conducted in Serang, Kedarpan and Sumilir villages in Purbalingga District. Data were collected through interviews, informal discussions, observations and documentary studies. Data analysis shows that the inexistence of guideline on how to involve community in decision making has resulted in the differences of the type of planning meeting. While Serang and Sumilir village apply open meeting, Kedarpan village prefers to apply representation meeting. In execution, community involvement is prominent, yet the system cannot fully abolish the practice of coercive mobilization of local resources. Finally, in evaluation stage, community is not involved much to evaluate the projects and accountability practice is still weak. Overall, this study finds that village head is the main actor determining what mechanism will be conducted to involve community in rural development.
|
NDC |
Agriculture [ 610 ]
|
Language |
eng
|
Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
Publisher |
広島大学大学院国際協力研究科
|
Date of Issued | 2012-03-31 |
Publish Type | Version of Record |
Access Rights | open access |
Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 1341-0903
[NCID] AN10482914
|