スポーツと労働をめぐる遊戯論的考察 : リガウアとグートマンを越えて
広島大学教育学部紀要. 第二部 Issue 41
Page 167-176
published_at 1993-03-05
アクセス数 : 1248 件
ダウンロード数 : 1046 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 9 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/27194
File |
BullFacEdu-HiroshimaUniv-Pt2_41_167.pdf
768 KB
種類 :
fulltext
|
Title ( jpn ) |
スポーツと労働をめぐる遊戯論的考察 : リガウアとグートマンを越えて
|
Title ( eng ) |
Sport and Work from the Viewpoint of Play Theory : Beyond Rigauer and Guttmann
|
Creator | |
Source Title |
広島大学教育学部紀要. 第二部
Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hiroshima University. Part 2
|
Issue | 41 |
Start Page | 167 |
End Page | 176 |
Abstract |
Bero Rigauer criticizes the situation of modern sports in his book Sport und Arbeit (1969). He declares that sport is merely disguised work and it has become specialized, bureaucratized, inhumane, and repressive.
Allen Guttmann translated this book into English in 1981. In the protracted translator's introduction to Sport and Work, Guttmann estimates the Rigauer's book as a radical criticism first appeared in systematic form. He considers that Rigauer's criticism is not based on that instinctive dislike of physical activity which has traditionally characterized a number of intellectuals but rather on a belief in the importance of play. However, Guttmann places himself on the critical standpoint in opposition to Rigauer as a Neo-Marxist. He concludes that the Neo-Marxist's argument against modern sports is exaggerated and a partial truth at best. In this paper, I critically considered both of Rigauer's Sport and Work and the Guttmann's criticism from the viewpoint of play theory which would be further connected with aesthetics. I suggested the necessity of a new conception of play and work rather than a new conception of sport. |
NDC |
Sports and physical training [ 780 ]
|
Language |
jpn
|
Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
Publisher |
広島大学教育学部
|
Date of Issued | 1993-03-05 |
Publish Type | Version of Record |
Access Rights | open access |
Source Identifier |
[ISSN] 0440-8713
[NCID] AN0021336X
|