このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 46854
本文ファイル
別タイトル
How Did Hegel Understand the “Judgment”?: Hegel’s criticism of the traditional metaphysics
著者
Hazama, Tomoki 大学院文学研究科 広大研究者総覧
キーワード
Urteil
Semantik
Kontextprinzip
Anti-Atomismus
Isomorphie
judgment
context-principle
anti-atomism
isomorphism
NDC
西洋哲学
抄録(英)
According to some philosophers, Hegel’s philosophy, especially his science of logic, is metaphysical. However recently, other philosophers (for example, R. Brandom) have presented non-metaphysical interpretations of Hegel’s philosophy. Is the non-metaphysical interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy persuasive? In this article, I aim to elucidate that Hegel had already anticipated some of the important ideas of late 19th- and 20th-century linguistic philosophy, i.e., the context principle and the difference between logic and (superficial) grammar, by analyzing both his criticism of traditional metaphysics and his original theory of “judgment.” Through this discussion, I will elucidate how Hegel understood “judgment.” Finally, I will present a persuasive non-metaphysical or “naturalistic” interpretation of Hegel’s speculative philosophy (“naturalistic,” but not in the sense of “physicalistic”).
掲載誌名
広島大学大学院文学研究科論集
78巻
開始ページ
1
終了ページ
14
出版年月日
2018-12-25
出版者
広島大学大学院文学研究科
ISSN
1347-7013
NCID
言語
ドイツ語
NII資源タイプ
紀要論文
広大資料タイプ
学内刊行物(紀要等)
DCMIタイプ
text
フォーマット
application/pdf
著者版フラグ
publisher
部局名
文学研究科
他の一覧