Wie verstand Hegel das „Urteil“ ?: Zu Hegels Kritik an der traditionellen Metaphysik
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : http://doi.org/10.15027/46854
ID | 46854 |
本文ファイル | |
別タイトル | How Did Hegel Understand the “Judgment”?: Hegel’s criticism of the traditional metaphysics
|
著者 | |
キーワード | Urteil
Semantik
Kontextprinzip
Anti-Atomismus
Isomorphie
judgment
context-principle
anti-atomism
isomorphism
|
NDC |
西洋哲学
|
抄録(英) | According to some philosophers, Hegel’s philosophy, especially his science of logic, is metaphysical. However recently, other philosophers (for example, R. Brandom) have presented non-metaphysical interpretations of Hegel’s philosophy. Is the non-metaphysical interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy persuasive? In this article, I aim to elucidate that Hegel had already anticipated some of the important ideas of late 19th- and 20th-century linguistic philosophy, i.e., the context principle and the difference between logic and (superficial) grammar, by analyzing both his criticism of traditional metaphysics and his original theory of “judgment.” Through this discussion, I will elucidate how Hegel understood “judgment.” Finally, I will present a persuasive non-metaphysical or “naturalistic” interpretation of Hegel’s speculative philosophy (“naturalistic,” but not in the sense of “physicalistic”).
|
掲載誌名 |
広島大学大学院文学研究科論集
|
巻 | 78巻
|
開始ページ | 1
|
終了ページ | 14
|
出版年月日 | 2018-12-25
|
出版者 | 広島大学大学院文学研究科
|
ISSN | 1347-7013
|
NCID | |
言語 |
ドイツ語
|
NII資源タイプ |
紀要論文
|
広大資料タイプ |
学内刊行物(紀要等)
|
DCMIタイプ | text
|
フォーマット | application/pdf
|
著者版フラグ | publisher
|
部局名 |
文学研究科
|
他の一覧 |