このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 27171
本文ファイル
別タイトル
Ecological validity of everyday memory research
著者
キーワード
everyday memory
ecological validity
autobiographical memory
eyewitness testimony
flashbulb memory
action slip
NDC
心理学
教育
抄録(英)
Comments on the debate between researchers who advocate laboratory-based and naturalistic study of memory, as to the relative merits and demerits of the two approaches, were presented. To evaluate the validity of Banaji and Crowder's (1989) claim that the naturalistic study of memory has been unscientific, unprofitable, and favoring the use of ecologically valid methods at the expence of generalization of results, four significant lines of everyday memory studies were reviewed and discussed: studies of autobiographical memory, studies of eyewitness testimony, studies of flashbulb memory, and studies of action slip. By evaluating the value of everyday memory research as compared with that of laboratory-based memory research, it was concluded that attempts to further progress in the study of human memory should try to integrate rather than alienate different approaches to human memory.
掲載誌名
広島大学教育学部紀要. 第一部, 心理学
41号
開始ページ
123
終了ページ
130
出版年月日
1993-02-10
出版者
広島大学教育学部
ISSN
0919-8652
NCID
SelfDOI
言語
日本語
NII資源タイプ
紀要論文
広大資料タイプ
学内刊行物(紀要等)
DCMIタイプ
text
フォーマット
application/pdf
著者版フラグ
publisher
部局名
教育学研究科
他の一覧