このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 48279
file
title alternative
Partisan Hate Speech and Freedom of Speech: Drawing on Matteo Bonotti’s Argument
creator
Yamamura, Toshihide
abstract
The debate on hate speech regulation in Japan tends to subdivide the context of hate speech. Constitutional Law Scholar Yuji Nasu categorized such discussion into (a)content, (b)subject. (c)medium, (d)mode of expression, (e)measures to regulate, (f) place.
According to this categorization, this Article considers a discussion about categorization of (b)subject. Especially, this Article focuses on Political Theorist Matteo Bonotti’s argument. His major concern is the place of political parties in political theory, not hate speech regulation. However, his argument on hate speech regulation mainly focuses on hate speech by elected partisans (that is, citizens who participate in politics through political parties) and partisans running for office.
By examining his argument, this Article aims to obtain the hint for the debate on hate speech regulation in Japan. His argument shows that we need to take into account special commitment and constraint of partisan speech, when considering partisan hate speech.
journal title
The Hiroshima Law Journal
volume
Volume 43
issue
Issue 1
start page
200
end page
143
date of issued
2019-06-25
publisher
広島大学法学会
issn
0386-5010
ncid
language
jpn
nii type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
HU type
Departmental Bulletin Papers
DCMI type
text
format
application/pdf
text version
publisher
rights
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
department
Graduate School of Social Sciences
他の一覧