このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 39794
file
title alternative
A Bird's-eye View of the Secrecy of Deliberations in the American Criminal Jury : Federal Rules of Evidence 606(b) and Interviews after the verdict
creator
Kawabe, Yukio
NDC
Law
abstract
The United States government's rule concerning the inspection of jury verdicts has the tendency to tighten its control over press coverage. The reason for the rule is that the after-verdict interviews given to the press can be intimidating for the former jurors and infringe on their privacy. They also harm jurors' free deliberations in the jury room. The legislature adopted Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which prohibits a former juror from being a witness in a court appeal and testifying there about the deliberations of a jury trial. The court interprets exceptions to 606(b) narrowly and has strengthened the injunctions on contact and jury anonymity. These results clearly show that the court is more interested in the finality of the jury verdict and the maintenance of the jury system than the justice of the jury verdict in an individual case. We should expect the laws and regulations on coverage after jury verdicts to be strengthened from now on.
journal title
The Hiroshima Law Journal
volume
Volume 39
issue
Issue 4
start page
172
end page
142
date of issued
2016-03-18
publisher
広島大学法学会
issn
0386-5010
ncid
language
jpn
nii type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
HU type
Departmental Bulletin Papers
DCMI type
text
format
application/pdf
text version
publisher
rights
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる。
department
Graduate School of Social Sciences
他の一覧