このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 48276
file
title alternative
Two Supreme Court Decisions on Ownership Reservation by a Credit Company, Continued
creator
abstract
The contract between a car sales company, a buyer and a credit sales company can be interpreted as an “agreement to use an asset as common collateral for multiple collateralized claims with different creditors”. In this case, the problem is that the creditor and the collateral holder are different.
The same problem arises even if the contract is interpreted in line with the law of substitution.
However, it can be understood consistently as protection of the effect of subrogation and as a special contract based on Article 504 of the Civil Code.
journal title
The Hiroshima Law Journal
volume
Volume 43
issue
Issue 1
start page
1
end page
15
date of issued
2019-06-25
publisher
広島大学法学会
issn
0386-5010
ncid
language
jpn
nii type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
HU type
Departmental Bulletin Papers
DCMI type
text
format
application/pdf
text version
publisher
rights
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
department
Graduate School of Social Sciences
Hiroshima University Law School
他の一覧