このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 34037
file
title alternative
Methodologies of Qualitative Research for Describing Children's Experiences : A comparison of M-GTA and TEM
creator
Sakai, Aiichiro
Nakanishi, Sayaka
subject
qualitative research
methodology
M-GTA
TEM
ECEC
質的研究
方法論
保育
NDC
Psychology
abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify, compare and contrast the features of the Modified Grounded Theory Approach (M-GTA) and Trajectory Equifinality Model (TEM) methodologies and to explore the possibility for using them to describe children's experiences in the field of early childhood education and care. These are qualitative research methodologies. First, in this the study, cases were collected by observing the scene where a target child carries out a target activity in a kindergarten classroom setting. Next, the cases were analyzed based on the common research question, using both the M-GTA and TEM approaches. By examining and analyzing the results using each methodology, it was clear what kind of knowledge is acquired from cases by using each methodology, and what kinds of problems each methodology has. Further examination showed that the feature in M-GTA that describes the process of a child's experience provides a structure and framework for explaining a child's activity. On the other hand, it became clear that the TEM approach describes the process of a child's experience itself, and that a TEM analysis can lead to great understanding of an individual child's experiences and transformation
journal title
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part 3, Education and human science
issue
Issue 61
start page
197
end page
206
date of issued
2012-12-21
publisher
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
issn
1346-5562
ncid
SelfDOI
language
jpn
nii type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
HU type
Departmental Bulletin Papers
DCMI type
text
format
application/pdf
text version
publisher
department
Graduate School of Education
他の一覧