このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 14359
file
title alternative
The Formation of Philosophical Environmental Ethics (II): Early Controversy over Environmental Ethics in the United States of America
creator
subject
環境倫理
新しい倫理
自然物の道徳的地位
自然主義的誤謬
Environmental Ethic
New Ethic
Moral Standing of Natural Objects
Naturalisitic Fellacy
NDC
Ethics. Morals
abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze seminal papers about environmental ethic that were published in 1970s in the United States of America. In my opinion the main points of controversy are need for a new ethic, moral standing of natural objects and naturalistic fallacy. The papers I selected here are following five ones: R. Routley, “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic ?" ; J. Feinberg, “The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations" ; C. D. Stone, “Should Trees Have Standing ?" ; K. E. Goodpaster, “On Being Morally Considerable" ; H. Rolston Ⅲ, “Is There an Ecological Ethic ?" Although there are some unsettledness or unclearness in those papers, it is certain that their main ideas had a great influence on the formation of philosophical environmental ethics.
journal title
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part. II, Arts and science education
issue
Issue 54
start page
67
end page
76
date of issued
2006-03-28
publisher
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
issn
1346-5554
ncid
SelfDOI
language
jpn
nii type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
HU type
Departmental Bulletin Papers
DCMI type
text
format
application/pdf
text version
publisher
department
Graduate School of Education
他の一覧



Last 12 months's access : ? times
Last 12 months's DL: ? times


This month's access: ? times
This month's DL: ? times