このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 33703
本文ファイル
別タイトル
Evidence and Narrative in Studies of ELT in Japan : In Comparison with EBM and NBM
著者
NDC
英語
抄録(英)
ELT studies in Japan are characterized by their disregard for qualitative approaches. Biased power relation between quantitative and qualitative researches is maintained by academic discourse as "regime of truth." The treatment of evidence and narrative, both as a symbol of quantitative and qualitative researches respectively, is to be examined in comparison with an advanced area of similar inquiry. This paper chose medicine for comparison because of its clinical nature and its inclusion of "Evidence Based Medicine" and "Narrative Based Medicine." The paper compared the features of ELT studies and medicine in terms of practice, quantification, and experimental design. It also introduced "evidence level" and understanding of narrative in medicine. This comparative study concludes that ELT studies in Japan overestimate their evidence and underestimate narrative in general. Reformation of the "regime of truth" is needed to grant legitimate power to narratives of teachers in classroom.
掲載誌名
中国地区英語教育学会研究紀要
40号
開始ページ
11
終了ページ
20
出版年月日
2010-03-31
出版者
中国地区英語教育学会
ISSN
0385-1192
NCID
言語
日本語
NII資源タイプ
学術雑誌論文
広大資料タイプ
学術雑誌論文
DCMIタイプ
text
フォーマット
application/pdf
著者版フラグ
publisher
権利情報
本論文の著作権は中国地区英語教育学会に属する
部局名
教育学研究科