アメリカにおける制定法解釈と立法資料(5)

廣島法學 40 巻 3 号 348-322 頁 2017-01-13 発行
アクセス数 : 1053
ダウンロード数 : 359

今月のアクセス数 : 4
今月のダウンロード数 : 2
ファイル情報(添付)
HLJ_40-3_348.pdf 919 KB 種類 : 全文
タイトル ( jpn )
アメリカにおける制定法解釈と立法資料(5)
タイトル ( eng )
Statutory Interpretation and Legislative History in the United States (5)
作成者
収録物名
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
40
3
開始ページ 348
終了ページ 322
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
抄録
This article attempts to examine the basic theory of statutory interpretation in the United States, recognizing that is becoming an important theme of administrative law in education and trial practice in recent Japanese law. In the 18th century in the United Kingdom, textualism was adopted as a rule of legal interpretation. In the United States during its founding period, the anti-federalist (Jefferson) and federalist (Hamilton) factions disagreed about the appropriate practice to follow. However, in the 1850s, textualism was adopted in both trial (Marshall Court) and administrative practices (Attorney General). The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked the emergence of a new statutory interpretation theory with legislative materials. This new theory was intentionalism. It was clearly established by the legal realism theory in the 1930s and 1940s, and by the combined factors of legislative activity and the litigation practice of administrative agencies during WWII from the New Deal period. However, because of concerns regarding the transformation of the administrative state, from the 1950s, legal realism became wary of intentionalism. The theory of legal process (Hart & Sacks) led the way to the new statutory interpretation theory. Purposivism saw legislative history as showing legislative intent in an abstract manner. Since the 1990s, the Supreme Court has adopted the methodology of new textualism. New textualism claims the complete elimination of the use of legislative history. There is also the question whether the value of democratic legitimacy or the rule of law can be implemented far enough. This article seeks to answer this question and asks how to envision statutory interpretation theory using legislative documents.
NDC分類
法律 [ 320 ]
言語
日本語
資源タイプ 紀要論文
出版者
広島大学法学会
発行日 2017-01-13
権利情報
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる。
出版タイプ Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む)
アクセス権 オープンアクセス
収録物識別子
[ISSN] 0386-5010
[NCID] AN0021395X