シュタイナー教育思想の哲学的基盤(4) : 「精神」と「自由」の獲得に向けたヘーゲルの認識論(後半)
HABITUS 21 巻
17-26 頁
2017-03-23 発行
アクセス数 : 1270 件
ダウンロード数 : 230 件
今月のアクセス数 : 6 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 2 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/42914
ファイル情報(添付) |
HABITUS_21_17.pdf
745 KB
種類 :
全文
|
タイトル ( jpn ) |
シュタイナー教育思想の哲学的基盤(4) : 「精神」と「自由」の獲得に向けたヘーゲルの認識論(後半)
|
タイトル ( eng ) |
The Philosophical Foundation of Steiner's Educational Thought (4) :Hegel's Epistemology Directed to the Acquisition of 'Spirit' and 'Freedom' (Part 2)
|
作成者 | |
収録物名 |
HABITUS
|
巻 | 21 |
開始ページ | 17 |
終了ページ | 26 |
収録物識別子 |
[PISSN] 2186-7909
[NCID] AA12942536
|
抄録 |
This thesis aims to clarify the structure of Hegel's epistemology as the foundation of Steiner's educational thought. According to Steiner, Hegel is a "philosopher of Goethe's worldview", as he systematized Goethe's metamorphosis theory in philosophy. However, while Goethe limited his theory of metamorphosis to the elucidation of natural processes, Steiner and Hegel applied it to the whole universe including human spirit, and explained it as a transformation process of thought. Moreover, for Hegel and Steiner, the dynamic worldview connecting such ideals and reality also functions as a theory on liberty. In other words, we aim to rise from a "freedomless way of life" relying on external objects and low dimensional senses to a spiritual ideal world. However, Hegel's theory was not sufficient for Steiner. Steiner disagreed with some of Hegel's concepts as follows: "a view of the state" set as the highest form of morality beyond the freedom of individuals, the "absolute spirit" defined as guiding history beyond human activity, and "the abstractness of the theory" based only on philosophical maneuvering deviated from human concrete reality. Steiner considered the freedom of spirit to be attributed to a vivid individual personality, which differed from Hegel who believed that the ultimate principle is "absolute spirit" and the ideal community framework is "one racial and ethnic nation". Thus, for Steiner, Hegelian external and transcendental abstract provisions were unacceptable.
|
NDC分類 |
西洋哲学 [ 130 ]
|
言語 |
日本語
|
資源タイプ | 学術雑誌論文 |
出版者 |
西日本応用倫理学研究会
|
発行日 | 2017-03-23 |
出版タイプ | Version of Record(出版社版。早期公開を含む) |
アクセス権 | オープンアクセス |
収録物識別子 |
[ISSN] 2186-7909
|