このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加
ID 16174
本文ファイル
別タイトル
Taking the Review of the Justices by the People Seriously : Dismissal Breeds Appointment
著者
キーワード
国民審査
最高裁判所
直接民主制
review by the people
the Supreme Court
direct democracy
NDC
法律
抄録(英)
On the Constitution of Japan, we the people can directly review and dismiss some judges of the Supreme Court at the first general election of members of the House of Representatives following their appointment. But no Justice has ever been dismissed. It is partly because the reveiw process was made in favor of silent assent and easy approval. I contend that the people and the opposition parties should have known of the judiciary and consciously dismissed as many dull or older Justices as could. If so, the new administration, whether it consisted of the ever-ruling party or the former opposition ones, could have appointed much more bright and relatively younger lawyers as new Justices, and then we could have got more chances to take part in the judicature and construct the more democratic Court indirectly. I suggest that at least dissident voters should dismiss all judges appointed by the old Cabinet except bright ones, so that the new government made by the new ruling party can renew the Court partly too. Indirect democracy approaches more direct one through concrete pledges. If only your party gives a pledge on the judicial appointment!
掲載誌名
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第二部, 文化教育開発関連領域
51号
開始ページ
43
終了ページ
52
出版年月日
2003-03-28
出版者
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
国立情報学研究所
ISSN
1346-5554
NCID
SelfDOI
言語
日本語
NII資源タイプ
紀要論文
広大資料タイプ
学内刊行物(紀要等)
DCMIタイプ
text
フォーマット
application/pdf
著者版フラグ
publisher
部局名
教育学研究科
他の一覧



過去1年のアクセス数 : ?
過去1年の本文閲覧数 : ?


今月のアクセス数 : ?
今月の本文閲覧数 : ?