公立学校における「親代わり」（in loco parentis）の法理
廣島法學 Volume 47 Issue 4
Page 136-118
published_at 2024-03-22
アクセス数 : 35 件
ダウンロード数 : 18 件
今月のアクセス数 : 4 件
今月のダウンロード数 : 3 件
この文献の参照には次のURLをご利用ください : https://doi.org/10.15027/55047
| File | |
| Title ( jpn ) |
公立学校における「親代わり」（in loco parentis）の法理
|
| Title ( eng ) |
The doctrine of “in loco parentis” in public schools
|
| Creator |
Inoue Yuki
|
| Source Title |
廣島法學
The Hiroshima Law Journal
|
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Start Page | 136 |
| End Page | 118 |
| Number of Pages | 19 |
| Journal Identifire |
[ISSN] 03865010
[NCID] AN0021395X
|
| Abstract |
In the Mahanoy decision, Justice Alito, who wrote the concurring opinion, and Justice Thomas, who wrote the dissenting opinion, used the doctrine of "in loco parentis" to discuss the regulation of off-campus speech, but came to different conclusions. This paper will then review the historical background of the doctrine and the development of its precedents in the Supreme Court of the United States. Then, since Justices Alito and Thomas referred to the "in loco parentis" doctrine in their respective opinions in the Morse and Mahanoy decisions, in which the constitutionality of public school students' freedom of expression was challenged, the differences between the two Justices' interpretations of the "in loco parentis" doctrine will be discussed.
|
| Language |
jpn
|
| Resource Type | departmental bulletin paper |
| Publisher |
広島大学法学会
THE SOCIETY OF LAW OF HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY
|
| Date of Issued | 2024-03-22 |
| Rights |
許可なく複製・転載することを禁じる
|
| Publish Type | Version of Record |
| Access Rights | open access |
